Concept
Who is feeding, who is absorbing
Complementarity already says the control axis produces fitted *opposite* rules rather than matching ones, which means a Dyad-Kin's two halves are often not comparable. So naming a Third has a second question: who supplies the rule and who receives the outcome. A loop can be reciprocal and not equitable, and if you are absorbing without feeding it is not yours to change.
Where it appears
Treated in
- Part Two — How to PracticeThe Trust TriangleAuthenticity, empathy, logic — the three legs a two-person weave stands on, and what breaks when one goes missing.
- Part Two — How to PracticePresenceA conversation is two people each building a model of the other while being modelled themselves — why an accurate reading lands as an attack until the other person can tell you're actually there.